Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
121. 0.0 Investigation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thomas Abernathy wrote: Lucien Visteen wrote: This is a very good read. Another tips might be to include anonymity if players don't want to be caught giving out information, like greying out their name and portrait before you upload the scr...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 20:44:00
|
122. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mag's wrote: Lucien Visteen wrote: Mag's wrote: You can still fit your ship to be very hard to probe. Only those fit with relevant implants are successful in probing down. There is also the speed way of avoiding capture, this has been use...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 20:34:00
|
123. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mag's wrote: You can still fit your ship to be very hard to probe. Only those fit with relevant implants are successful in probing down. There is also the speed way of avoiding capture, this has been used to good effect many times. But here ...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 20:17:00
|
124. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Lucien Visteen wrote: Though I would like to, a pod don't have a cloak. GǪand that is why F1 is all you need. Oh, I suppose you might need F2 as well, if you're a bit slow, but meh GÇö same difference. Quote: Oh well, was ...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 20:15:00
|
125. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Feligast wrote: Lucien Visteen wrote: Tippia wrote: F1. And then? I have not driven him out yet Lock pod. F1. Though I would like to, a pod don't have a cloak. Oh well, was hoping that there was a simple solution that would end ...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 19:47:00
|
126. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: F1. And then? I have not driven him out yet
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 19:31:00
|
127. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Yes. Or, well, no, because the means to do so already exists and doesn't need to be included in the fix. And what is the means to drive a cloaker out of the system that requires the same amount of effort as the cloaker uses to ...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 19:04:00
|
128. Anti-Cloaking Probes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mr Painless wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Bullshit. The fact that everyone, including cloakers, show up in local simply means that someone doesn't have to sit on the gates and wormholes and stare at a screen where not much happens for hours at a t...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 18:54:00
|
129. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Mag's wrote: Why do people insist on messing with and breaking cloaks, instead of looking at the cause of AFKing? I don't know about you or the others, but personally I'd rather get at the AFK part, than th...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 18:49:00
|
130. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Mag's wrote: Why do people insist on messing with and breaking cloaks, instead of looking at the cause of AFKing? I don't know about you or the others, but personally I'd rather get at the AFK part, than the cloak part. ...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 18:24:00
|
131. Is there a way to have ONLY valid targets on your overview? No there is not. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It is actually very easy. All you have to do is...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 18:20:00
|
132. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Where is the sense of danger to the docked pilot?? Should there be a tool to boot people out of stations too??? A cloaked ship represents potential danger, nothing more until it decloaks. It's the potential danger you...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 17:09:00
|
133. Let me tell you why people are killing highsec miners. A manifesto. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What if all the miners just up and left, who would you gank then? Or what would you do if you had no ganking targets left to gank? How would you react if others began to gank you because there where no one else to gank?
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 15:06:00
|
134. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Seriously, AFK cloaking is NOT an issue. Let a pilot hang out in system for 10 days.... the pilots in that system need to learn how to cope with the constant pressence of danger!!! That's part of life in nullsec. Yet...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 14:29:00
|
135. 0.0 Investigation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is a very good read. Another tips might be to include anonymity if players don't want to be caught giving out information, like greying out their name and portrait before you upload the screenshots. People tend to be more talkactive if they ...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.15 14:22:00
|
136. What if i dont want the christmas presents listed? Thx for the Fish - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote: Yes because i collect computers, reallly terrible comparisation... pls try again I was only wondering if your reaction would be the same. You are worried about marked value so what is the difference? I didn't say you...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.14 15:15:00
|
137. Null sec & Worm hole ideas. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I would like to suggest a player created defence force instead of sentry drones. A group of fighters that reacts to players that make hostile actions against the alliance the outpost belongs too. Give it a capacity of maybe 20 drones, or 4 active ...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.14 15:09:00
|
138. Anti-Cloak that doesn't break the game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Really? How would it break wormhole intel gathering? By making the covops be visible while it refuels? They have to be mobile. Apperantly that is a bad thing
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.14 13:40:00
|
139. What if i dont want the christmas presents listed? Thx for the Fish - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What if you got a new computer as a present from someone. Do say the same thing to them? "Yeah, you know, its cool that you give me this computer for free and all, but I see that it is already a million others that have this same pc out in the wo...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.14 13:14:00
|
140. Thanks for the christmas gifts CCP! (yes you read that right) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jonathan Ferguson wrote: Well, ****, if 150M for everybody is good, then surely 300M for everybody is better, right? And if 300M is better then giving everyone 100 free titans and infinite (or let's call it 999 trillion just to be safe) faction...
- by Lucien Visteen - at 2011.12.14 12:53:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |